Mineral Licensing – Why Does Its Management Depend on Stakeholders External to the ANM?

The Mineral Licensing regime is the legal instrument for the utilization of substances for immediate use in civil construction, such as sand, gravel, and clay. Although frequently described as a “simplified” rite, its operational management is one of the most complex, as its success does not depend solely on the National Mining Agency (ANM).

The validity, extension, and very existence of the federal title are intrinsically linked to decisions by external stakeholders: the municipal City Hall and the landowner. This article details how this interdependent relationship works in each phase of the mineral right’s life cycle.


1. The Granting of the Title: A Municipal and Private Foundation

Unlike other regimes that begin and end within the ANM, the Mineral Licensing journey starts outside the agency.

  • Step 1: The Local Basis – Before filing any protocol with the ANM, the interested party must obtain the specific license for the mineral activity, issued by the City Hall of the municipality where the area is located.
  • Step 2: Private Consent – In parallel, it is necessary to formalize the authorization from the landowner. The applicant must either be the owner of the land or possess an express consent document from them.
  • Step 3: The Federal Registration – Only in possession of these two documents, in addition to the environmental license, can one apply for the Licensing Registration with the ANM, which will consolidate the title.

2. Validity and Extension: Synchronizing Deadlines

The most critical characteristic of this regime is the title’s validity. The term of the Licensing Registration at the ANM is always linked to the shortest term between the municipal license and the landowner’s authorization.

This creates a direct dependency for the extension of the right:

  • Prerequisite: Extension at the ANM is impossible without first renewing the municipal license and the landowner’s authorization in their respective spheres.
  • Action: The titleholder must file the extension request with the ANM before the expiration of the current title, already attaching the renewed external documents.

The ANM cannot extend a right whose supporting foundation (the municipal license or landowner authorization) has already expired.


3. Title Closure: Renunciation and Remaining Obligations

The voluntary closure of the title occurs through the act of renunciation, a formal and irrevocable procedure that extinguishes the right to mine.

However, renunciation does not end all obligations. Responsibility for the environmental recovery of the area persists. It is mandatory to present and execute the Mine Closure Plan, and the titleholder is only relieved of their obligations after the final approval of the closure by the ANM and the competent environmental agency.

In summary, the Mineral Licensing regime requires diligent and synchronized management of processes on three distinct fronts: the federal (ANM), the municipal (City Hall), and the private (landowner). Failure on any of these fronts compromises the legal security and operational continuity of the project.


📷Generated by AI

Latest news
Receive our news!

Sign up to receive our newsletter.

    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.